Double-blind review journal
All submitted manuscripts in IJMRI are processed through the Manuscript Peer-Review Process (MPRP), a fast, structured, and rigorous double-blind review system. This unified platform enables seamless collaboration among authors, reviewers, editors, and the editorial team throughout the entire manuscript handling and evaluation process.
Authors must ensure the following steps are completed before the final submission of a manuscript for peer review:
All manuscripts must be submitted online through www.ijmri.in. The submitting author is fully responsible for the manuscript throughout the submission and peer-review stages, ensuring that:
First-time users must register on the portal and verify their email to access the author dashboard. Returning users may log in using their existing credentials, Google account, or ORCID ID.
After successful login, authors can begin the submission process. During submission, authors must provide complete funding information and confirm compliance with all funder requirements.
Manuscripts should be prepared according to the required structure, including:
Authors must provide:
Ensure appropriate spacing, margins, page numbering, and adherence to the specified word limit and journal formatting requirements.
Each manuscript submitted for publication must be accompanied by a concise cover letter. The cover letter should clearly highlight the significance of the research, position it within the existing literature, and justify its relevance to the journal’s scope. It must include the following details:
The Title Page must include the following details:
Manuscripts submitted to the journal must fall under one of the following categories:
The abstract should provide a clear and accurate summary of the manuscript, reflecting its full content rather than serving as an introduction. It must include only information presented in the main text and should not contain citations. The abstract should be **150–250 words** and organized under the following subheadings:
Briefly describe the purpose of the study, essential procedures, major findings, and key conclusions.
Provide a concise description of the primary methods, treatments, or protocols used in the study.
Present the key findings in a logical sequence, supported by tables, figures, and text as appropriate.
Summarize the main interpretations aligned with the study’s objectives, avoiding broad or unqualified claims.
Include 3–6 relevant keywords after the abstract. These should be specific to the study and aligned with the subject area.
The introduction should present the study within a broad context and emphasize its significance. It must clearly define the purpose of the work, highlight its relevance, and reference key previous studies in the field. The content should remain understandable to readers and researchers who may not be specialists in the specific topic.
This section should include information available at the time the study was planned or the protocol was developed.
Provide a clear, concise, and accurate description of all primary and secondary outcomes as presented in the Materials and Methods section.
Interpret the results in the context of previous research and the original hypotheses. Discuss the implications, significance, and relevance of the findings in the broadest possible context, identifying both strengths and limitations.
Summarize the key findings and their significance. This section should state the overall conclusions of the study and may also highlight potential directions for future research.
Acknowledge grants, funding sources, institutional support, and any individuals who contributed to the work. These acknowledgements should appear at the end of the article before the references and may also be included on the title page as a footnote.
A separate section should disclose the use of any AI tools or AI-assisted support.
An Authorship Statement is required to clearly outline the contributions, roles, and responsibilities of each author involved in the research. This statement enhances transparency, accountability, and credibility in scholarly publishing.
Review articles should be authored by experts who have made significant contributions to the subject area. While the journal invites selected experts to submit reviews, unsolicited review articles are also welcomed. A high-quality review article must focus on a specific topic, issue, or research question and go beyond summarizing existing literature. Instead, it should **interpret, integrate, and critically evaluate** previous studies to present a comprehensive understanding of the current state of knowledge.
Authors should also include a brief summary of their own contributions and experience in the field relevant to the review. Additionally, the manuscript must contain a clear description of the methods used for locating, selecting, extracting, and synthesizing the reviewed data.
Case reports and case studies should present novel, uncommon, or particularly insightful cases. Submissions must highlight unique diagnostic or therapeutic challenges and provide valuable learning points for readers. The report should contribute meaningfully to existing knowledge by documenting observations that can inform future practice or research.
Letters to the Editor should address recent developments, current issues, or articles published in the journal within the past year. These letters must focus on a significant aspect of the referenced manuscript and offer clear, concise, and constructive commentary or critique. They should reflect the author’s informed perspective and contribute to scholarly discussion.
| Article Type | Word Limit (excluding abstract, references, etc.) |
Abstract & Keywords | Figures & Tables | References (APA style) |
Structure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Original Research Article | 2000–4500 words | Structured (150–250 words): Background, Aim/Objectives, Materials and Methods, Results, Conclusion Keywords: 3–10 |
Up to 8 figures + 8 tables (300 DPI: JPEG, PNG, TIFF) |
8–60 | Introduction, Materials and Methods, Results, Discussion, Conclusions, References |
| Review Article | 2500–6000 words | Unstructured Abstract (150–250 words) Keywords: 3–10 |
Up to 8 figures + 8 tables | 12–90 | Abstract, Keywords, Introduction, Discussion (with subheadings), Conclusion, References |
| Case Report / Case Study | 1000–2500 words | Unstructured Abstract (≤150 words) Keywords: 3–8 |
Up to 15 figures + 8 tables | 8–25 | Introduction, Case Presentation, Discussion, Conclusion, References |
| Letter-to-Editor | 250–600 words | No abstract | Maximum 2 figures or tables | 3–8 | Free format (concise and focused) |
| Short Communication / Commentary | 600–1500 words | Unstructured abstract optional | Maximum 2 figures or tables | 5–15 | Flexible structure |
| Editorial / Guest Editorial / Others | 300–1000 words | No abstract | Maximum 1 figure or table | Optional (≤10) | Free format |
All manuscripts must adhere to the following formatting guidelines:
All measurements must follow the International System of Units (SI). If alternative units are used, authors must provide their equivalent SI values to maintain clarity and consistency.
Authors must provide details of any supplementary materials submitted with the manuscript, such as figures, tables, spreadsheets, videos, or other files. Each item should be clearly labeled with its type and title, for example: Figure F1: Title, Table T1: Title, etc.
All forms of administrative, technical, or financial support—including grants, funds, contributions, or in-kind assistance—must be acknowledged in a separate section on the title page.
A clear Author Contribution Statement is required. Authors should outline their substantial contributions to the study—including conceptualization, design, data collection, analysis, interpretation, drafting, or revision of the manuscript. Authorship must include only those who have meaningfully contributed to the work.
Authors must specify where the data supporting their findings can be accessed. This includes links to publicly archived datasets generated or analyzed in the study. If no data were generated or analyzed, this statement may be omitted.
Authors must disclose any financial or personal relationships that could influence the study, such as employment, consultancy, share ownership, honoraria, or expert testimony. If sponsors had no role in the study design, analysis, or publication decision, this must be stated clearly. If there are no conflicts of interest, authors must explicitly declare this. For further guidance, authors may consult the COPE guidelines on Conflicts of Interest/Competing Interests.
References and citations included in supplementary materials are permitted, provided they also appear in the main text and are listed in the reference section in proper sequence.
The journal is committed to promoting open scientific exchange and supporting authors in adopting best practices for sharing and archiving research data. Authors of published articles are strongly encouraged to make their research data accessible whenever possible.
All guidelines related to data sharing are outlined in the journal’s “Instructions for Authors.” The data-sharing policy requires that, at minimum, the core dataset supporting the results and conclusions of a published study be made publicly available. All shared datasets must be properly cited and comply with the journal’s specific requirements.
The journal primarily follows the APA referencing style (7th Edition), with certain allowable exceptions for published and unpublished sources.
Use the author–date citation style (APA format), without numbering or superscripts.
Examples:
1. Journal Articles (up to 20 authors)
Singh, S. K., & Shukla, R. (2025). Impact of corporate branding on consumer preference and brand loyalty: A comparative study of the personal care segment in the Indian FMCG sector. Journal of Management Research and Analysis, 12(3), 146–151. https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jmra.36368.1758701374
Article with more than 20 authors
List the first 19 authors, then add an ellipsis (…) followed by the final author.
Article with an Article Number
Jerrentrup, A., Mueller, T., Glowalla, U., Herder, M., Henrichs, N., Neubauer, A., & Schaefer, J. R. (2018). Teaching medicine with the help of “Dr. House.” PLOS ONE, 13(3), Article e0193972. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0193972
2. Book
Jackson, L. M. (2019). The psychology of prejudice: From attitudes to social action (2nd ed.). American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/0000168-000
3. Book Chapter
Aron, L., Botella, M., & Lubart, T. (2019). Culinary arts: Talent and their development. In R. F. Subotnik, P. Olszewski-Kubilius, & F. C. Worrell (Eds.), The psychology of high performance (pp. 345–359). American Psychological Association.
4. E-Book
Svendsen, S., & Løber, L. (2020). The big picture/Academic writing: The one-hour guide (3rd digital ed.). Hans Reitzel Forlag. https://thebigpicture-academicwriting.digi.hansreitzel.dk/
5. Conference Proceeding Papers
Duckworth, A. L., Quirk, A., Gallop, R., Hoyle, R. H., Kelly, D. R., & Matthews, M. D. (2019). Cognitive and noncognitive predictors of success. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 116(47), 23499–23504. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1910510116
6. Newspaper Articles
Coronavirus in India live updates: Delhi reports 57 new cases, zero deaths in last 24 hours. (2021, September 15). The Times of India. https://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/india/coronavirus-in-india-live-updates-covid-19-kerala-sept-13/liveblog/86153604.cms
7. Blogs
Manhas, R., & Saproo, K. (2024, September 7). The intelligent libraries: Adapting to the AI age. IP Innovative Publication Blog. https://blog.ipinnovative.com/the-intelligent-libraries-adapting-to-the-ai-age/
8. Preprints
Hampton, S., Rabagliati, H., Sorace, A., & Fletcher-Watson, S. (2017). Autism and bilingualism: A qualitative interview study of parents’ perspectives and experiences. PsyArXiv. https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/76xfs
9. Published Thesis
Kabir, J. M. (2016). Factors influencing customer satisfaction at a fast food hamburger chain (Publication No. 10169573) [Doctoral dissertation, Wilmington University]. ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global.
10. Website
Oil painting. (2019, December 8). Wikipedia. https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Oil_painting&oldid=929802398
Note: For full instructions, refer to the APA Style Guidelines (7th Edition).
Authors are strongly encouraged to follow the SAGER (Sex and Gender Equity in Research) guidelines to ensure responsible and inclusive research reporting. When relevant, manuscripts should clearly describe whether sex and gender differences are expected and how they may influence the study.
In the background section, authors should indicate any anticipated sex- or gender-related variations. If the study does not incorporate sex or gender analysis, a clear justification must be provided in the discussion section. The journal recommends that authors follow the complete SAGER guideline framework to promote transparency, rigor, and equity in scientific research.
For more information, visit the Publication Ethics section.
Self-plagiarism includes reusing one’s own previously published work without proper citation, using another author’s content without acknowledgment, or presenting a newly framed idea that is directly derived from an existing source. Such practices are treated as plagiarism by the journal. To ensure originality and integrity, editors and reviewers use standard software like Turnitin, iThenticate, etc., for plagiarism screening.
After submitting your manuscript, authors are encouraged to recommend two potential reviewers who possess suitable expertise related to the manuscript’s topic. While editors are not obligated to contact the suggested reviewers, your recommendations help facilitate the peer-review process.
Suggested reviewers must not be affiliated with the same institution as any of the authors. Authors may also propose suitable Editorial Board members of the journal. Additionally, reviewers may be selected from among the scholars whose work you have cited frequently in your manuscript.
All submitted manuscripts must be written in clear and grammatically correct English. Authors who need assistance with language quality are encouraged to have their manuscripts professionally edited before submission. Professional editing services—such as those offered by Innovative Author Services—can help ensure clarity, accuracy, and readability.
High-quality language improves the review process and enhances readers’ understanding of your work. Please note that all accepted manuscripts will undergo language editing as part of the journal’s publication process.
The corresponding author will receive one complimentary print copy of the journal issue. Additional hard copies may be purchased from the editorial office at the prevailing single-issue price. The publisher and sponsoring society are not responsible for replacing lost original copies or providing extra complimentary copies.
All submitted manuscripts undergo an initial screening by the Editorial Office. This stage ensures that the submission is correctly structured, complies with journal policies, and meets ethical requirements, including guidelines for human and animal research.
Manuscripts that do not meet these basic standards may be rejected before peer review or returned to authors for revision. After this assessment, the Managing Editor consults with the Editor-in-Chief or Associate Editors to determine the next steps.
After passing primary scrutiny, each manuscript is assigned to a minimum of two independent experts for double-blind peer review. Reviewers must:
All reviews, decisions, and communications are managed through the journal’s Pre-Publication Portal. Authors receive reviewer comments exclusively through this portal.
If authors disagree with any reviewer comment, they must provide a clear, evidence-based response.
The journal aims to maintain an efficient and transparent review timeline:
In case an author requires assistance with the submission of their manuscript at our online submission portal, please contact editor@ijmri.co.in.
The following templates are available for download to assist authors in preparing their manuscripts: